Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Las Vegas Street Performer Challenges for Right to Entertain editorial policy.
  1. Macau to Increase Oversight of Casinos and Junkets Prior to Operator License Renewals

Compare Accounts
×
Argentina Former Prosecutor Charged with Illegal Gambling, Embezzlement
Provider
Name
Description
Bet365, Entain Topped the List of GambleAware’s $21M in Donations Last Year  XFL Odds: Dallas Renegades Favored to Win Big Over St. Louis BattleHawks in Week 1  A’s Las Vegas Stadium May Not Get Retractable Roof Shown in Renderings  Penn National Stock Rallies on Susquehanna Upgrade  Encore Boston Harbor Sportsbook and Theater Expansion Gains City Approval  XFL Odds: Dallas Renegades Favored to Win Big Over St. Louis BattleHawks in Week 1  XFL Odds: Dallas Renegades Favored to Win Big Over St. Louis BattleHawks in Week 1  New York Court Rules Daily Fantasy Sports Legalization Unconstitutional, State Likely to Appeal  Las Vegas Sands, MGM, Other Gaming Stocks Pounded Amid Renewed COVID-19 Fears  Wynn New York Pitch Viable, Digital Unit Could Take Time to Deliver Upside